|
Search
Website
Home
Calendar
of Events
Contact
Us
Board
of Directors Board
Login
Education
Course
Descriptions
Class
Schedule Cert.
Maintenance Instructors
Events
& Programs
Membership
User
Login
Company
Coordinators
Career/Jobs
Articles
& Papers
Selected
Links
Current
News Links
Feedback
  
 
|
EDITORIAL
Virtual Teams: Identifying The Benefits and Problems
By Ira Smolowitz, Ph.D.
__________________________________________________________________________
Virtual teams have been defined as “the 21st
century’s version of traditional teams. 1]“…studies indicate that
virtual teams (teams in which most members cannot regularly meet
face to face) embrace technology quickly and use it to disseminate
information more efficiently than traditional teams. 2] TechnoTeams
has listed the benefits of virtual teams. I have taken the liberty
of summarizing their three page list of benefits.3]
Improved Decision-Making - Virtual teams become adept
at moving information quickly, and at making it available for
the entire team or entire organization. This efficient flow of
information facilitates better and faster decision processes.
Ideal Matching of Personnel & Task (without concern for location)
- By removing location as a component of team selection, virtual
teams can assemble the organization’s overall best possible mix
of knowledge and skills. Talent dispersed throughout a global
company can be used efficiently without constant travel or relocation
(which sometimes drives talented employees away.) This is a considerable
benefit and often the point that pushes companies to start using
virtual teams. Take Lockheed Martin for example. “Having the wrong
skills in the wrong place most of the time was what drove us to
think about virtual teams,” says Joe Cleveland, president of Lockheed
Martin Enterprise Information Systems (as quoted in Melymuka,
p.70 (3).
Fewer Face-to-Face Meetings - Since virtual teams can converse
and share information easily through the use of technology, the
need for face-to-face meetings is greatly reduced. The reduction
in meetings also results in a reduction in time lost due to travel
and the disruption of being out of the office. Opper & Fersko-Weiss
estimate one in three meetings can be eliminated in this manner
(Opper & Fersko-Weiss, p.45). In the future, face-to-face meetings
may be eliminated all together as cutting edge technology helps
virtual teams feel like they are meeting in person. For example,
NCR has employed a “high-speed, full bandwidth continuously available
audio/video/data link that they affectionately nicknamed ‘the
Worm Hole” (a reference to Start Trek) (Lipnack & Stamps, p.78).
Engineers positioned the cameras and tables in the meeting rooms
to create the illusion of everyone sitting at one table. However,
because technologies like this are very expensive to develop and
to maintain, they are currently only a possibility for large companies
with deep pockets.
Here are some examples of prominent companies employing virtual
teams. 4]
Verifone
Verifone
is owned by Hewlett-Packard, and produces low-cost equipment for
credit card and cheque authorization. Verifone’s employees are
scattered all over the world, with less than 7% located at the
tiny corporate headquarters in California. All employees are linked
electronically and are able to share in major decision. Verifone’s
transnational infrastructure juxtaposes efficiency, responsiveness,
and learning.
Eastman
Kodak
A virtual team was used to develop a single-use camera for
the European market. Though the camera’s features were similar
to those on the market elsewhere in the world, Kodak wanted
to adapt the camera’s features so that it would appeal to European
buyers. German engineers worked with the design teams, first
in New York, and later through telecommunications links from
Europe. By creating a virtual team that allowed input from people
across the world, Kodak was able to quickly respond to a local
market opening.
Benefits not withstanding, there are in my opinion, serious problems
associated with virtual teams. The Stanford Graduate School of Business
has indicated:
…Virtual teams may extract an unexpected price: People
who add their hard-won knowledge to a common pool may became alienated
from the organization and even fear that they are sowing the seed
for their own replacement.
After all, says Stanford’s Margaret Neale, if your knowledge -
not to mention the tricks and tips it has taken years to learn
- is deposited in a database for all to access, does the organization
still need you? “It’s a real fear,” says Neale. “Technology has
the potential to destabilize the relationship between organization
and employees.”
Also a serious concern: Employees working in virtual teams are,
to a certain extent, isolated from their colleagues. Although
they may have contact with other employees of their organization,
they don’t spend much time with them. In this situation, the virtual
worker loses opportunity to learn from his or her closest colleagues.
In effect, there’s a double penalty. The virtual worker perceives
herself as giving away her knowledge but not having the chance
to “replenish her own reservoir of knowledge,” and thus feels
even more vulnerable, says Neale. 4]
In my opinion in a period of down-sizing, employees are reluctant
to share knowledge. This is true whether virtual teams are/are not
in place.
Consider the following scenario: Jones or Smith are to be downsized:
Jones has general skills and knowledge. Smith has more specific
skills and to some extent is the sole repository of the above knowledge.
All things considered, Jones is the more vulnerable employee. It
seems to me, that Stanford’s Margaret Neale has identified a serious
problem associated with virtual teams.
References
1. “TechnoTeams-A Resource for Virtual Teams… downloaded 3/12/04
from dmswed.badm.sc.edu/technoteam/BenefitsFina (.htm p.1)
2. “Workers Fear Cooperating in Virtual Teams May Make Them Obsolete
“ Stanford Graduate School of Business-Research (October 2003)-downloaded
3/12/04 from http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/research nr___virtualteams.shtml
p.1
3. Techno Teams- op.cit., pp.1-3
4. Stanford Graduate School of Business, op.cit., p.1
_________________________________________________________________________________
Articles printed with the permission of Dr. Ira Smolowitz,
Professor of Finance and Dean, Bureau of Business Research and Program
Development at American International College, Springfield, MA.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Page updated: June 18, 2007 2:04 PM |
...................................................................................................................................................
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions
or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of
the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of APICS.
Neither APICS nor the author(s) assume, and hereby disclaim, any
liability for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions,
whether such errors or omissions resulted from negligence, accident
or other causes.
APICS Pikes Peak Chapter P.O. Box 486 Colorado Springs, CO 80901
Phone: 719-578-1225
APICS
Logo is a Registered Trademark ®
Unique daily website visitors since June 1, 2005
Mission
Statement Privacy
Statement
All
contents © 2007. All rights reserved.
|